A New Addition to the Spinosauridae Family

You could go up to anyone on the street and ask them if they think dinosaurs are cool and they’d probably say yes. How could they not, giant reptiles that roamed the Earth, ones that people could only observe as bones in a museum or in fiction, what’s not to love? One such of these dinosaurs is the Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, commonly known as the Spinosaurus. The Spinosaurus was a large theropod that lived in North Africa around 95 million years ago, it had a semiaquatic lifestyle, living in and near rivers and consuming mainly fish and other aquatic organisms (Sereno, nd). But, the organism as it is known today may as well be a completely different creature to the one first discovered, and as of this past  Thursday, the 19th of February 2026, a new species of Spinosaurus has been described.

The earliest fossils that could be associated with the Spinosaurus date as far back as 1820, but they were falsely named as other species, until German paleontologist Ernst Stromer named the Spinosaurus in 1915 (Moody et al, 2010; Stromer, 1915). Between 1912-1914, Richard Markgraf, a paleontologist hired by Stromer, would find 2 fossil specimens, leading to 2 published papers by Stromer, one based on the original neotype specimen in 1915, and another updated with the new specimen in 1936 (Stromer, 1915; Stromer, 1936). As a part of the 1936 paper, Stromer would work with Dr. Erhardt to reconstruct a full Spinosaurus skeleton based on his 2 specimens (Figure 1). Unfortunately Stromer would lose his life’s work in 1944, when the British Royal Air Force bombed Munich, destroying the museum where all of Stromer’s fossils were kept (Wigfield, nd). There would be much more work done throughout the rest of the 20th century, an at the time disproved theory about it being a quadruped, theories about the purpose of the sail, theories about an aquatic animal focused diet (Carpenter, 2002; Bailey, 1997; Charig and Milner, 1997). The next major discovery would come in 2014, when Nizar Ibrahim and a team of paleontologists published a paper theorizing that the Spinosaurus was actually a semi aquatic dinosaur evolved for swimming and aquatic hunting (Figure 2) (Ibrahim et al, 2014). 

Figure 1: Stromer and Erhardt’s reconstruction of the Spinosaurus aegyptiacus. The shaded bones are the ones from actual specimens while the remainder were filled in from other theropods (Stromer, 1936).

Figure 2: The skeletal structure of the Spinosaurus based on Ibrahim et al’s research, as sketched by Dr. Scott Hartman.

Figure 3: The reconstructed skeletal structure of Spinosaurus mirabilis (Sereno et al, 2026). The highlighted blue sections are the fossils found, with the various other portions showing closer looks at these fossils. The remaining bones are based on the Spinosaurus aegyptiacus.

Most recently, a research team headed by American paleontologist Paul Sereno published a research paper on February 19th, 2026, describing a newly discovered Spinosaurus species, the Spinosaurus mirabilis (Figure 3) (Sereno et al, 2026). The S. mirabilis was found in the Jenguebi fossiliferous area in the central Sahara, an area dated to the same age of ~95my as the Farak Formation where Stromer’s original neotype was found. The new species is distinguished from the neotype based on the low profile of its snout, a greater spacing in its posterior maxillary teeth, and a hypertrophied nasal-prefrontal crest. In fact, the head crest of S. mirabilis is now thought to be the tallest head crest of any theropod dinosaur, with it likely having had a keratinous sheath while the dinosaur was alive making it even larger then the fossil shows. The specific holotype specimen for this species is made up of the following fossils: an associated right premaxilla, both maxillae, the base and the bottom half of the fused nasal crest with portions of both prefrontals, the alveolar edge of the right dentary, and five maxillary teeth found in association with the maxillae. Component analysis of the body places the species in between wader and aquatic diver type predators in terms of predation. Furthermore, Sereno et al found that through phylogenetic analysis, they could determine three broad evolutionary phases for the Spinosaurus that had a hand in this species evolution. First of all in the Jurassic period, an ancestor underwent radiation leading to the skull elongating in order to better hunt for fish, before splitting into 2 main designs, baryonychine and spinosaurine. In the early Cretaceous, spinosaurids as a whole became the dominant predator of the time due to the circum-Tethyan habitats. Finally in the late Cretaceous, spinosaurines were geographically stuck to northern Africa and South America, where they grew to their maximum body size as shallow water ambush specialists. The evidence listed above, and the location of the fossils within a riverbank of an inland basin, leads to a theory that this species was a wading shoreline predator that lived until an abrupt eustatic sea level rise in the Cenomanian, alongside its associated climate change, lead to the end of spinosaurid radiation. 

References

BBC. 2025. “Walking with Dinosaurs – the Spinosaurus That Was Lost in the War.” BBC. May 29, 2025. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/600gTCm3Md9ZptCHh1nrV6M/the-spinosaurus-that-was-lost-in-the-war.

Carpenter, Kenneth. 2002. “Forelimb Biomechanics of Nonavian Theropod Dinosaurs in Predation.” Senckenbergiana Lethaea 82 (1): 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03043773.

Charig, Alan, and Angela C Milner. 2025. “Baryonyx Walkeri, a Fish-Eating Dinosaur from the Wealden of Surrey.” Bulletin of the Natural History Museum. Geology Series 53: 11–70. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/75343.

“Discoveries | Paul Sereno – Paleontologist | the University of Chicago.” n.d. Paulsereno.uchicago.edu. https://paulsereno.uchicago.edu/discoveries/spinosaurus_aegyptiacus/.

Folge, Neue, Heft, and Ernst Stromer. n.d. “Abhandlungen Der Bayerischen Akademie Der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung Ergebnisse Der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers in Den Wüsten Ägyptens VII. Baharije-Kessel Und -Stufe Mit Deren Fauna Und Flora Eine Ergänzende Zusammenfassung.” https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Abhandlungen-Akademie-Bayern_NF_33_0001-0102.pdf.

Ibrahim, Nizar, Paul C. Sereno, Cristiano Dal Sasso, Simone Maganuco, Matteo Fabbri, David M. Martill, Samir Zouhri, Nathan Myhrvold, and Dawid A. Iurino. 2014. “Semiaquatic Adaptations in a Giant Predatory Dinosaur.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 345 (6204): 1613–16. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258750.

“Redirect Notice.” 2026. Google.com. 2026. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/abs/neural-spine-elongation-in-dinosaurs-sailbacks-or-buffalobacks/03FBDA4F4D4B89F96AED9C9FF742F3A7&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1771862376396768&usg=AOvVaw0_ybSnsuMJeEfyYyIxPNLH.

“Results of Prof. E. Stromer’s Research Expedition in the Deserts of Egypt II. Vertebrate Remains from the Baharîje Beds (Lowermost Cenomanian).” n.d. https://www.dinochecker.com/papers/Stromers-Egypt-expedition_Spinosaurus_Stromer_1915.pdf.

Richard, Eric Buffetaut, Darren Naish, and David M Martill. 2010. “Dinosaurs and Other Extinct Saurians: A Historical Perspective – Introduction.” Special Publication – Geological Society of London/Geological Society, London, Special Publications 343 (1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1144/sp343.1.

Sereno, Paul C., Daniel Vidal, Nathan P. Myhrvold, Evan Johnson-Ransom, María Ciudad Real, Stephanie L. Baumgart, Noelia Sánchez Fontela, et al. 2026. “Scimitar-Crested Spinosaurus Species from the Sahara Caps Stepwise Spinosaurid Radiation.” Science 391 (6787). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adx5486.

Comments

7 Responses to “A New Addition to the Spinosauridae Family”

  1. Zachary Wise Avatar
    Zachary Wise

    Hey iSci,

    After submitting my Pages project last Sunday talking about the progression of discoveries regarding the Spinosaurus, no less then 4 days later a new species was described in a paper by Sereno et al. From the moment I heard about the paper I thought what better idea to write my blog post on then to talk about the new Spinosaurus mirabilis and bring my research as up to date as possible on the topic. I hope it is an interesting read and I look forward to your feedback.

    Sincerely,
    Zachary

  2. Jenny Yong Avatar
    Jenny Yong

    Hi Zachary,

    I also saw news about this new species and thought it was super exciting! Some suggestions:

    – For readability, I would recommend breaking up your last paragraph to make it more digestible.
    – Format your references title as a header
    – Your firstcitation for the Sereno et al. paper says n.d. but your later citations cite the date as 2026 so make sure this is consistent.
    – Ensure your in-text citations are in Chicago style.

    Overall great work!
    Jenny

  3. Kristen Falik Avatar
    Kristen Falik

    Hi Zachary!

    This is a super interesting blog post topic! I like how you wrote about something recent in the news, it is very relevant.

    -Your first reference is from BBC, I suggest seeing if you can switch this source for a scientific source as using news source is subjective.

    -This post also seems a bit over word count, I suggest condensing some of the information in the last paragraph and also adding a clear concluding paragraph to wrap up the whole post.

    -In P3 S2, ensure you put a space between 95 and the unit ‘my’.

    -Additionally, in the final paragraph ensure you add another in-text citation near the end of the paragraph.

    I hope you find these suggestions helpful!

    Happy editing,

    Kristen

  4. Jaden Chiang Avatar
    Jaden Chiang

    Hi Zach,

    Good job on your blog post! You blend the history of science and the history of the earth in a very interesting topic. Below are a few suggestions:

    – the first 2 sentences of your post are very engaging, but consider refining them so the writing follows a more formal, academic tone
    – P1S4: change the comma after “years ago” to a period or semicolon to ensure the sentence is gramatically correct
    – P1S5: consider changing the end of the sentence to “as of February 19, 2026, a new species of Spinosaurus was described” for readability
    – consider breaking up your second and third paragraphs to avoid large bodies of text and three figures in a row. Aim to have each figure follow a (shroter) paragraph.
    – check the 7th citation in your list as the title and formatting are a bit weird. Also, consider changing your reference title to centre-aligned and a larger/bold font.

    I would also agree with Kristen that your post would benefit from some revision to make it more concise and stay under the word count.

    Overall, great work!

    Jaden

  5. Sarah Winter Avatar
    Sarah Winter

    Hi Zachary. I enjoyed your blog post and appreciated learning more about these incredible creatures and what we’ve learned more about them with these discoveries. I just had a few small suggestions for you to use to make your blog post even better.

    – Make sure that you put your figure AFTER the paragraph in which it is first reference. So, since you don’t reference figure 3 until the last paragraph, make sure to put it after that one instead of above it.

    – I know others already mentioned this, but I just want to emphasize the suggestion to split up your paragraphs more. As they are, it makes it hard to read and to distinguish between different ideas. Also make sure to have a clear concluding paragraph to summarize your information without introducing anything new.

    – You give a lot of dates, especially in your second paragraph. Although I do appreciate all your figures, a better use of one of them may be for you to construct a simple timeline to illustrate everything you’re saying. While you could always just add this as a 4th figure, the most figures I’ve always seen in a post is 3, so I would suggest choosing one to replace.

    I hope you take my suggestions in mind for your final draft, in order to help with the flow of your blog.
    Happy editing!

  6. Cassie Ephrem Avatar
    Cassie Ephrem

    Hey Zach!

    Super cool blog post! Here are some tips to help improve for the final draft:

    1. Make sure to cite your figures in the figure captions!

    2. I don’t know if this source: “Redirect Notice.” 2026. Google.com. 2026. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/abs/neural-spine-elongation-in-dinosaurs-sailbacks-or-buffalobacks/03FBDA4F4D4B89F96AED9C9FF742F3A7&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1771862376396768&usg=AOvVaw0_ybSnsuMJeEfyYyIxPNLH. is for one of your figures but you can cut the long link at the end to make it: “Redirect Notice.” 2026. Google.com. 2026. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/abs/neural-spine-elongation-in-dinosaurs-sailbacks-or-buffalobacks. Also there might be a better way to cite this since “redirect notice looks odd”. If you don’t know who they authors are just say “Anon”

    Happy editing,
    Cassie

  7. Veer Jain Avatar
    Veer Jain

    Hi Zach, I really enjoyed reading your post since I find Spinosaurids fascinating. I have a few suggestions.

    1. In the reference list the “Redirect Notice. Google.com” reference seems to be cited incorrectly as there is no author name or article name. Also for the “Results of Prof. E. Stromer’s Research” reference, make sure you follow chicago author date formatting.

    2. Your figures are great and even a bit underused. Consider explaining why each figure matters (ex. what figure 3 adds that earlier reconstructions could not show)

    3. Your last paragraph introduces many new ideas and therefore is a bit long. I would suggest splitting it into two paragraphs. (ex. separate anatomy with evolutionary discussion)

    Overall, great work and good luck on your final draft!

    Veer

Leave a Reply