Mutt-tastesis; a Discussion of Comparative Oncology

Dogs are much more than man’s best friend, as surprisingly enough, they can provide significant insight into the field of oncology. Many species, both wild and domesticated, have documented cases of developing cancer (Abu-Helil and van der Weyden, 2019). There has been significantly more research conducted on cancer incidence in house pets, as 80-90% of pet owners order autopsies following the sudden departure of their canine companions (Abu-Helil and van der Weyden, 2019). Cancer is a major health burden in dogs, as 30% of dogs, across all breeds, die from cancer (Nolan et al., 2019). The unfortunate prominence of cancer in dogs presents a unique research opportunity into the mutation and metastasis of a multitude of different types of cancers; thereby establishing the basis of comparative oncology.

One of the reasons why cancer research in house pets is so relevant to modern medicine is that their living conditions basically mirror our own; we share the same spaces, drink the same water, are exposed to the same airborne pollutants, and likely have a great deal of overlap in our diets (Nolan et al., 2019). Additionally, the diagnostic imaging and treatments for domestic animals are nearly identical to those associated with human cancer (Nolan et al., 2019). Mice have also been used to study cancer, but their life span and size vastly differ from our own, making juxtaposed analysis difficult (Abu-Helil and van der Weyden, 2019). The advantage of studying spontaneous cancers in non-laboratory animals is the fact that both the cancers and the animals themselves are found to be genetically-heterogenous, just like humans (Abu-Helil and van der Weyden, 2019).

Figure 1: A comparison between dog (Left) and human (Right) cancer cells for three different melanoma subtypes is pictured above; (A) animal type; (B) simulating naevi; and (C) epithelioid (Andre and Prouteau, 2019).

Melanomas, lymphomas, breast cancer, and some sub types of skin cancer are all examples of cancers affecting other species as well (Nolan et al., 2019). In the case of melanomas in particular, humans and dogs share striking similarities, even at the cellular level (Figure 1). For instance, canine melanomas present several interesting areas of research. In humans, we have correlated melanoma incidence with fair skin types and increased UV exposure, but this trend is not supported when it comes to melanoma occurrence in dogs (Andre and Prouteau, 2019). With dogs, while most breeds are covered in fur, light skin pigment is not thought as a contributing factor to melanoma incidence and conversely, darker-furred dogs have higher rates of melanoma incidence (Andre and Prouteau, 2019). What is most fascinating, is possibly that certain breeds are shown to have a higher predisposition to melanomas (Andre and Prouteau, 2019).

Our pet companions are a great model for the development of spontaneous cancers that often bridge the species division, providing a unique opportunity to deliver and monitor the effectiveness of treatments, as well as identify new genes and loci that play a role in the incidence of cancer, guiding the development of new diagnostic and treatment approaches to achieve better prognosis in both humans and our pets. Comparative oncology therefore suggests a collaboration between human oncologists and veterinary oncologists, united against a common enemy.

Works Cited

Abu-Helil, B. and van der Weyden, L., 2019. Metastasis in the wild: investigating metastasis in non-laboratory animals. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 36(1), pp.15–28.

Andre, C. and Prouteau, A., 2019. Canine Melanomas as Models for Human Melanomas: Clinical, Histological, and Genetic Comparison, 10(7), pp.501-554

Nolan, M., Kent, M., and Boss, MK., 2019. Emerging Translational Opportunities in Comparative Oncology With Companion Canine Cancers: Radiation Oncology. [online] Available at: <https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2019.01291/full> [Accessed 14 Jan. 2020].

Comments

5 Responses to “Mutt-tastesis; a Discussion of Comparative Oncology”

  1. Paige Johnson Avatar
    Paige Johnson

    Hey everyone!

    I decided to write my blog post on comparative oncology. I first heard about this approach to cancer research sometime last year but I’ve been thinking about it more lately as RP4 draws nearer.
    While cancer is extremely tragic in both human and animals, comparative oncology is to me, a hopeful area of research, as sometimes new perspectives can yield a breakthrough.
    I hope you enjoy reading this as much as I enjoyed researching the subject area!

    Cheers,
    Paige

  2. Christina Brinza Avatar
    Christina Brinza

    Hi Paige,

    I enjoyed reading your blog post! I never thought about cancer research in pets, and I didn’t realize incidence rates were so high in dogs. It’s neat how some risk factors for this disease are similar for dogs and humans, and others (like skin/fur colour) are different. You did a fantastic job of explaining your topic and keeping your blog post cohesive and interesting. Your title is also very creative!

    I do have a couple of minor suggestions. I think an image could help keep your audience engaged. Something like a graph displaying some of the trends or statistics you list in your post would be interesting and relevant.

    Also, your writing is generally very good, but there are some sentences which contain too many commas. For example, the second clause of the third sentence is a bit choppy, and could be rewritten as “80-90% of pet owners order autopsies following the sudden departure of their canine companions”. There are a couple other small issues in your first paragraph, but your second and third paragraphs are very well written.

    The only other thing I noticed is that your second source (in your references list) is cited as a website, with an [Accessed…] date and link, when it should be cited as a journal article. Even though its available online, the citation shouldn’t include “[Accessed…]” or “[online]” or the URL, and can be cited as a print article because it’s formally published in a journal.

    Overall, great job with your blog post! I look forward to reading your next piece.

    – Christina

    1. Paige Johnson Avatar
      Paige Johnson

      Hey Christina!

      I’m glad you found the post interesting. There’s so much potential in the field of comparative oncology, I’m really excited to see what research emerges in the future. Thank you so much for your suggestions, I’m going to be incorporating all of them into my blog post. Especially the journal citations, I’ll make sure to edit them!

      Cheers,
      Paige

  3. Panteha Jamshidian Avatar
    Panteha Jamshidian

    Hey Paige!
    I really enjoyed reading your blog post. Some of the numbers really took me by surprise. I had no idea that 30% of dogs die from cancer. You did say across all breeds, which got me wondering which breeds experience the highest rates, and of what type of cancer? That’ll be something I can look into.
    As for your writing, overall it was well done and easy to follow. A couple minor suggestions:
    – in the first paragraph you say “The unfortunate prominence of cancer in dogs present a unique…” i suggest maybe using “presents”?
    – In the last paragraph you use a semicolon “…of cancer; guiding…” however the second clause is not independent. Maybe a comma would be better, or making it into two separate sentences?
    Overall really good post and a very interesting topic. Happy editing!
    -Panteha

    1. Paige Johnson Avatar
      Paige Johnson

      Hey Panteha!

      Thank you so much for your suggestions! I made both of the edits you suggested. Also, I believe golden retrievers, bernese mountain dogs, and german shepards have the among the highest rates of cancer in dogs.

      Thanks again for your helpful suggestions!
      Paige