Did That Really Happen? How the Brain Rewrites Reality

Have you ever been entirely sure that something occurred, only to later find out it never truly happened? Many people may think that a memory is like our own inner camera, recording everything that happens and storing it for future recollection. In contrast, our memories are rather a reconstruction, where our brains piece events together to form bits of information (Newman and Lindsay 2009). To do this, our brains may reshape memories to help fit our own personal story, which can introduce errors. These false memories occur in specific parts of the brain, which are the hippocampus, and the prefrontal cortex (Straube 2012).

The hippocampus is the location in the brain where memories are stored (Burgess et al. 2002; Straube 2012). It helps us remember important personal experiences by building a mental representation of the memory, as seen in Figure 1. The anterior hippocampus is involved with bigger concepts of memories, whereas the exterior is involved with scenery details and spatial layout of memories. When recalling a memory, there are two things that determine how much the hippocampus needs to work. One aspect is the open-ended nature of memory, like remembering a childhood story, and another is the significant role of perception in memory. Increased mental constitution demands more work from the hippocampus, which may result in mistakes (Sheldon and Levine 2016; Straube 2012).

Figure 1: This figure illustrates the hippocampus’s role in memory formation, explaining how it processes visual input for storage, leading to fragmented memories. Only important details are remembered, making room for the brain to fill in the missing gaps (Voss et al. 2017)

A memory is not a perfect recording of reality, but rather your brain taking in information, storing it, and rebuilding it for later (Straube 2012). There are three stages of memory reconstruction where false memories occur. The first stage is encoding, which is when you first experience something. During this stage, your brain is recording what you see. If it does not record it perfectly, then false memories can form. Self-referential encoding is a type of encoding where you might recall something because it resonates with you personally, even if it’s not factually accurate. Spreading activation encoding also occurs when your brain links related ideas together. The second stage is consolidation, which occurs when a memory is stored. Your brain stabilizes and stores memories over time, especially when you sleep. Overtime, the exact details of the memory may start to fade away. Misinformation encountered now could blend with facts, altering details of the memory. The third and final stage is retrieval, which is when you finally recall the memory. At this stage, the brain reconstructs the memory again. Before retrieval, the brain is supposed to check if the memory actually occurred, if you imagined it, or if someone else gave you misinformation. The part of the brain that is needed at this step is the prefrontal cortex. If the prefrontal cortex does not catch this error, a false memory is produced (Straube 2012).

In conclusion, although all memories feel true, some of them may be false. The production of false memories goes to show that the human memory is not a flawless recording, but rather a reconstruction of events that happened, sometimes allowing the brain to fill in the gaps where details are missing (Newman and Lindsay 2009). Understanding the mechanism behind memory reconstruction can help us understand why some of our most vivid memories may not always reflect reality (Newman and Lindsay 2009; Straube 2012).

References

Burgess, Neil, Eleanor A. Maguire, and John O’Keefe. 2002. “The Human Hippocampus and Spatial and Episodic Memory.” Neuron 35 (4): 625–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00830-9. 

Newman, Eryn J., and D. Stephen Lindsay. 2009. “False Memories: What the Hell Are They For?” Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (8): 1105–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1613. 

Sheldon, Signy, and Brian Levine. 2016. “The Role of the Hippocampus in Memory and Mental Construction.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1369 (1): 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13006. 

Straube, Benjamin. 2012. “An Overview of the Neuro-Cognitive Processes Involved in the Encoding, Consolidation, and Retrieval of True and False Memories.” Behavioral and Brain Functions 8 (1): 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-35. 

Voss, Joel L., Donna J. Bridge, Neal J. Cohen, and John A. Walker. 2017. “A Closer Look at the Hippocampus and Memory.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21 (8): 577–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.008.

Comments

4 Responses to “Did That Really Happen? How the Brain Rewrites Reality”

  1. Kristen Taylor Avatar
    Kristen Taylor

    Hi Brianna,

    This was a fascinating topic for a post and I can definitely relate! Here are a few small suggestions for your edits:

    – I would reword the last sentence of paragraph 1 from “which are the hippocampus, and the prefrontal cortex” to “namely the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex”.

    – In your figure caption, rather than saying “the hippocampus’s role”, you could say “the role of the hippocampus”.

    – In sentence 10 of paragraph 3, “overtime” should be 2 words.

    – Remember to add a comment explaining how you chose this topic and how it connects to iSci!

    Overall, great job and good luck with your edits!

    Kristen

  2. Brianna Ankoma Avatar
    Brianna Ankoma

    Hi iSci,
    I decided to theme my blog post around false memories because there has been many times where I seem to remember things that didn’t really happen, so I wanted to further research and find out why that occurs.
    Thanks for reading!

  3. Nam Nguyen Avatar
    Nam Nguyen

    Hi Brianna,

    Great blog post! I think being aware of how our brains perceive reality is a fascinating topic to explore; reminds me of an idea called “self imposed limitation” by Edward Frenkel. However unlike him, you gave a more scientific approach to examination rather than a philosophical one. Here are some points of feedback.

    – P1S5: I would remove the comma after hippocampus as it is not necessary there.
    – P2S3: I would change exterior to posterior to be more anatomically precise.
    – P2S6: I’m not sure if “mental constitution” is the best choice of wording. Consider changing it to something more familiar sounding. Perhaps cognitive demand, cognitive load, or mental construction?

    Overall, great job! I look forward to reading the final draft!

    Nam

  4. Hanna Yip Avatar
    Hanna Yip

    Hi Brianna,

    This is a great blog post, some suggestions I have:

    – In figure 1. it features that diagram of the brain where specific parts and processes are labeled, if you could allocate a sentence or two about it in the caption that would increase clarity in your post!

    – In your second last paragraph, you describe the ways in which memories can become false and I think if you provided an example of what these memories could be it would strengthen your writing (e.g “recall something because it resonates with you personally, even if it’s not factually accurate”)

    This is a great blog post, be proud of your work!
    Hanna

Leave a Reply