For the goldfish in Cootes Paradise, there isn’t much of a choice.
In 2017, a study investigated the impacts of anthropogenic contamination in multiple sites downstream of a wastewater treatment plant (Simmons et al., 2017). This water discharges into Cootes Paradise Marsh, leaving it polluted with various pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Simmons et al. found that chronic exposure to the contaminated environment resulted in high neurotransmitter concentrations in goldfish plasma, with one of the most prominent being serotonin (Figure 1).
Figure 1: A graph showing the activity of goldfish at three different locations (Simmons et al., 2017). The red and orange bars indicate two sites along the Cootes Paradise Marsh and the green bar shows the control site used in the study. The control site is at Jordan Harbour, a conservation area in Lake Ontario. These results indicate that the goldfish in both locations at Cootes Paradise have significantly higher activity levels than at the control site.
Well-known for its ability to make you happy and feel good, serotonin is a neurotransmitter that controls a range of neuropsychological processes, including mood, perception, appetite, and attention (Berger, Gray and Roth, 2009). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used to create medications for numerous psychological disorders to increase serotonin concentrations in the synaptic membrane (Nutt et al., 1999). In turn, this allows for therapeutic effects in conditions such as depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. While helpful for humans, SSRIs pose a much greater risk for fish and other aquatic organisms.
SSRIs block presynaptic serotonin transmitters and prevent the expulsion of synaptic serotonin, which causes elevated concentrations in the plasma (Prasad, Ogawa, and Parhar, 2015). In fish, this is exhibited by higher activity and exploratory behaviours, indicating a reduced sense of anxiety (Simmons et al., 2017). However, the ability to estimate predation risk diminishes. Through increased activity, the fish abide less by the predator avoidance phenomenon, increasing their chances of being attacked (Brodin et al., 2014).
Fish with higher serotonin levels are also more prone to dispersal, which is detrimental to the schooling structure that fish tend to live in. Schooling provides protection against predators, giving these fish an evolutionary advantage (Kasumyan and Pavlov, 2018). Additionally, the school provides foraging, reproduction, and migration advantages providing them with an evolutionary advantage over other species. When this critical behaviour is impaired, it puts the species at much higher risk of predation and lowers fitness. This is because fish release a chemical from epidermal cells when facing predation threat (Scott and Sloman, 2004). In response, surrounding fish exhibit predator avoidance behaviours such as decreased swimming and increased schooling. However, the observed anxiety-reducing (anxiolytic) effect of serotonin can reduce the response to these signals. When coupled with their exploratory tendencies under elevated serotonin levels, the animal faces slim odds of survival.
Although more research is required in this field, the effects of pharmaceutical contamination, notably those with SSRIs, are clearly harmful to the aquatic environment. So while the fish may be enjoying their zen lives right now, it is short-lived and action needs to be taken by us to ensure their long-term survival.
Works Cited
Berger, M., Gray, J.A. and Roth, B.L., 2009. The Expanded Biology of Serotonin. Annual review of medicine, 60, pp.355–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.60.042307.110802.
Brodin, T., Piovano, S., Fick, J., Klaminder, J., Heynen, M. and Jonsson, M., 2014. Ecological effects of pharmaceuticals in aquatic systems—impacts through behavioural alterations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1656), p.20130580. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0580.
Kasumyan, A. and Pavlov, D., 2018. Evolution of Schooling Behavior in Fish. Journal of Ichthyology, 58, pp.670–678. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945218050090.
Nutt, D.J., Forshall, S., Bell, C., Rich, A., Sandford, J., Nash, J. and Argyropoulos, S., 1999. Mechanisms of action of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology: The Journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 9 Suppl 3, pp.S81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-977x(99)00030-9.
Prasad, P., Ogawa, S. and Parhar, I.S., 2015. Role of serotonin in fish reproduction. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, p.195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00195.
Scott, G.R. and Sloman, K.A., 2004. The effects of environmental pollutants on complex fish behaviour: integrating behavioural and physiological indicators of toxicity. Aquatic Toxicology, 68(4), pp.369–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2004.03.016.
Simmons, D.B.D., McCallum, E.S., Balshine, S., Chandramouli, B., Cosgrove, J. and Sherry, J.P., 2017. Reduced anxiety is associated with the accumulation of six serotonin reuptake inhibitors in wastewater treatment effluent exposed goldfish Carassius auratus. Scientific Reports, 7(1), p.17001. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15989-z.
Comments
9 Responses to “Here for a Good Time or a Long Time?”
Hi everyone!
I hope you enjoyed reading my blog post! I chose this topic because I found that it integrates concepts from PAIx and neuroscience in a very interesting way. We have learnt about normal predator-prey relationships, but comparing the normal behaviour of fish to when they are exposed to pharmaceuticals gave me a new perspective on the topic. Also, the primary study I used as the foundation for my post was based in Cootes Paradise, which made the topic even more relevant to us.
I would love to get some feedback for my final version, so please leave any suggestions you have!
Samridhi
I really enjoyed your blog post and it was interesting to see this happening right here in the city. Well done! I had a few suggestions:
1. Change ‘fishes’ to fish for better flow.
2. I would suggest restructuring the first sentence in the first paragraph to make it a bit more clear.
3. If mentioned in the study, could you specify what the location of the control site was?
4. There is a spelling error in the third paragraph, ‘casuses’ to causes.
Overall this was an amazing post. Looking forward to your final post, and more research into this issue!
Happy editing,
Muneeza
Hi Muneeza,
Thanks for your suggestions! They were very helpful in improving the flow of the post, so I have applied all of them into my post.
Samridhi
Hello Samridhi!
Your post was great! I have only one small suggestion! In your fourth paragraph, second last sentence, you use the word “anxiolytic”, personally I am not familiar with this word and I needed to look it up to understand the sentence. I would suggest that in order to aid more readers, you either use a different word or, re-word the sentence to help better explain what you mean.
I look forward to reading your next post!
-Aunika
Hi Aunika,
Thanks for the suggestion! I can definitely see how adding a definition for anxiolytic/re-wording can help in reader’s understanding. I will add that in!
Samridhi
Hi Samridhi!
This was such a cool post! I thought it was very interesting that anxiety reduction happens in humans and fish upon ingestion of SSRIs. I also liked the clever title :). I just have a couple comments for you:
1) In the first sentence of your last paragraph, did you mean to say “… individuals are MORE vulnerable to predators.”? I think this would make more sense in the context of the information so I just wanted to ask.
2) I would just be careful about using the word “create” in your last sentence. Maybe it could be reworded for clarity.
Thanks for sharing!
Take care,
Gillian
Hi Gillian,
Thanks for your feedback, I have implemented your second suggestion into my post! As for the first suggestion, I actually did mean to say less vulnerable, since schooling helps protect fishes from predators. Maybe I need to restructure the sentence in order to make this more clear.
Thanks again!
Samridhi
Hi Samridhi,
I really love that you wrote a post about our own backyard! Your writing style was very clear and engaging. Here are a few suggestions:
– I would recommend putting a few “bigger picture” sentences at the begging to provide some context before getting into the specifics. You do a good job with this in your second paragraph but adding some at the start would be beneficial.
– Based on our feedback from the results presentations, I don’t think it is necessary to say “a bar graph” in your first figure caption.
– Double check with the citation guide, but I think you need a comma after Ogawa in your in text citation.
– Your reference list at the end does not include any formatting (eg italics). I bet this just happened when you transferred it to synopsis, so just double check that it follows the correct formatting.
Overall, I really enjoyed reading your post!
Cheers,
Teagan
Hi Teagan!
Thanks for your feedback! I will try to add in some more background context to the beginning of the post (word count permitting!). I have added in all your other suggestions though and I think it has helped refine the post a lot!
Samridhi