In November 2018, Chinese scientist He Jiankui ignited controversy in the scientific community by revealing he had edited the genomes of twin embryos known as Lulu and Nana to be resistant to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (Cohen, 2019). Many researchers were horrified that genetic manipulation was performed on a human being. However, He justified his actions, stating that the girls would be protected from developing the potentially lethal disease (Saey, 2018).
He used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to alter CCR5 (Saey, 2018), a coreceptor that allows the HIV virus to enter human cells, as shown in Figure 1 (Blanpain et al., 2002). Research has shown that a 32 base pair deletion in the coding region (CCR5-delta32) confers HIV resistance to those with homozygous genotypes (Ni, Wang, and Wang, 2018). He tried to mimic this deletion, and states that while one twin still has a wild-type CCR5, the other has two non-functional copies of the gene, which should make her resistant to the virus. (Cohen, 2019). Controversy aside, this may seem like a promising method to combat the HIV public health crisis. However, what He’s team may not have accounted for is that the CCR5-delta32 mutation is thought to increase susceptibility to other diseases (Klein, 2008).
Figure 1: To infiltrate cells, the HIV virus binds to the CCR5 coreceptor. In humans with the 32 base pair deletion, HIV can no longer bind to the receptor since the proteins do not appear on the cell surface. This prevents the virus from entering and infecting the cell (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013).
Recent research suggests that those who carry CCR5-delta32 are more likely to have an increased risk of developing flaviviruses (Klein, 2008). The Flaviviridae family are RNA viruses commonly found in ticks and mosquitoes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013). They are responsible for a host of potentially deadly diseases, including West Nile Virus, Zika, Tick-borne encephalitis, and Yellow Fever, among others (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013).
A study performed in 2006 proved West Nile Virus to be fatal in a group of mice without healthy CCR5 (Epps, 2006), and these findings have since been extended to analysis on humans. In a meta-analysis of four different American cohorts, there is a significantly higher number of patients with West Nile Virus that are homozygous for the CCR5-delta32 mutation than those with typical wild-type alleles (Lim et al., 2008). It has also been reported that in a study of patients with the virus, around 5% of those with West Nile had the homozygous mutant genotype, compared to 1% of a typical population (Epps, 2006). This may seem like an insignificant number, but it equals the magnitude of protection that mutant genotypes are given against HIV (Epps, 2006). In this way, the editing of the genome truly becomes a tradeoff; it is possible to create resistance to HIV, but this increases susceptibility to West Nile in the same proportions. While the mechanism by which the mutation confers resistance is largely unknown (Klein, 2008), it is a consideration that certainly merits future study.
This case study creates an ethical and evolutionary dilemma. If altering an embryo’s genome becomes commonplace, how do medical professionals decide which diseases to eradicate? It is now possible that the Pandora’s box of genetics has been opened; scientists could hold the key to determining how a population will evolve. If genome alterations become permissible, the challenge will be to balance the risks between protecting against one disease, but increasing susceptibility to another.
Works Cited:
Blanpain, C., Libert, F., Vassart, G. and Parmentier, M., 2002. CCR5 and HIV infection. Receptors & Channels, 8(1), pp.19–31.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013. Flaviviridae | Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (VHFs) | CDC. [online] Available at: <https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/virus-families/flaviviridae.html> [Accessed 27 Oct. 2019].
Cohen, J., 2019. Did CRISPR help—or harm—the first-ever gene-edited babies? [online] Science | AAAS. Available at: <https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/08/did-crispr-help-or-harm-first-ever-gene-edited-babies> [Accessed 27 Oct. 2019].
Epps, H.L.V., 2006. CCR5 thwarts West Nile virus. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 203(1), pp.4a–4a.
Lim, J.K., Louie, C.Y., Glaser, C., Jean, C., Johnson, B., Johnson, H., McDermott, D.H. and Murphy, P.M., 2008. Genetic Deficiency of Chemokine Receptor CCR5 Is a Strong Risk Factor for Symptomatic West Nile Virus Infection: A Meta-Analysis of 4 Cohorts in the US Epidemic. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 197(2), pp.262–265.
Ni, J., Wang, D. and Wang, S., 2018. The CCR5-Delta32 Genetic Polymorphism and HIV-1 Infection Susceptibility: a Meta-analysis. Open Medicine, 13, pp.467–474.
Klein, R.S., 2008. A Moving Target: The Multiple Roles of CCR5 in Infectious Diseases. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 197(2), pp.183–186.
Saey, T.H., 2018. Researcher defends creating CRISPR twins, fails to quell controversy. Science News. Available at: <https://www.sciencenews.org/article/researcher-defends-creating-crispr-babies-fails-quell-controversy> [Accessed 27 Oct. 2019].
US Department of Health and Human Services 2019. CD4 Receptor. [image]. Available at: <https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/understanding-hiv-aids/glossary/824/cd4-receptor> [Accessed 27 Oct. 2019].
Comments
9 Responses to “Have we opened the Pandora’s box of genetics?”
Hello everyone,
I got the idea for this blog post from my evolution class. My professor mentioned that resistance to HIV increases susceptibility to other diseases, so I wanted to take a closer look at this topic. I am also currently taking a bioethics class, so wanted to tie in a bit of genetics, evolution, and philosophy.
I look forward to hearing your suggestions for improvement!
Thanks,
Caitlin
Hi Caitlyn!
I really enjoyed your blog, this is such as huge issue and you did a wonderful job of conveying the significance of what this gene editing means for our future. A one suggestion I have is to make sure you introduce what HIV is before using the HIV short form.
– I really enjoyed the picture you used as it was very helpful to visualize the viral pathway used by HIV.
Happy editing,
Kasia
Hi Kasia,
Thanks for the comment! I will definitely introduce HIV before referring to it by the short form.
Caitlin
Hello Caitlin,
I really liked your topic of choice – it was very fascinating!
I just have a couple of suggestions:
1) It would appear that the last sentence in your first paragraph is run-on. I would split that into two or three sentences. Perhaps something along the lines of “[M]any researchers were adamant that this kind of experimentation on humans was abhorrent[.] [But, h]e advocated for the benefit of his work[;] maintaining that the girls would be protected from developing a lethal [pandemic] disease[.]”
2) This is a preference, but I would remove the “CCR5-delta32” and “that yields HIV resistance” in the last sentence of the second paragraph. Considering that you named the mutation a couple sentences back, it seems redundant to name it again. Furthermore, since the theme of your paragraph is HIV resistance, it isn’t necessary to mention it again.
Overall, this was a great blog post! I hope that my suggestions were helpful – happy editing!
Cynthia
Cynthia,
Thank you for taking the time to leave feedback on my blog post. I will fix the redundancy in the the second paragraph, and will try to shorten the really long sentence you pointed out.
Caitlin
Hi Caitlin,
I really enjoyed reading your blog post and found the topic to be very interesting.
My only suggestion would be regarding a sentence in your second paragraph. I would suggest using a semi-colon so that it would read “He tried to mimic this so that while one twin still has a wild-type CCR5, the other has two non-functional copies of the gene; which would make her resistant to the virus even if exposed (Cohen, 2019).”
Overall, I found your post to be very well written.
Cheers,
Veronica
Hi Veronica,
Thanks for taking the time to leave feedback on my blog post. I appreciate the suggestion, but the addition of a semicolon where you suggested would not create a grammatically correct sentence. The semicolon would indicate that “which would make her resistant to the virus even if exposed” can stand alone, but this would turn it into a dependent clause.
Thanks again for your comment!
Caitlin
Hey Caitlin,
I really enjoyed reading your blog post! It was both informative and extremely fascinating. I have a few suggestions on some next steps you could take with it (feel free to take or leave them):
In your last sentence of the second paragraph it reads: “However, what He’s team…”, where I believe you meant to write “However, what his team…”.
I would try and further explain the mechanisms behind the CCR5 alteration, and how the mutation of the co receptor is able to make individuals somewhat immune to HIV, as with the current wording I found it a little hard to follow. I might also explain further into what the CRISPR/Cas9 system is, since some people may not be familiar with it. Also consider adding a summarizing sentence at the end of your piece or at the end of one of your paragraphs on the CCR6-delta32 mutation on the total benefits and drawbacks of using this mutation within the scope of genetic therapy.
Overall, a really good post. I look forward to reading some of your future posts!
Margot
Hi Margot,
Thanks for taking the time to leave feedback on my blog post.
In the second paragraph, I did not mean to say “his team.” I wanted to say He’s team, as He is the name of the scientist, so the way I wrote it is correct.
Unfortunately, I do not have space the word count to discuss CRISPR/Cas9. I will however, try to expand upon the mutation of the coreceptor in the figure caption to clarify the mechanism.
Caitlin