What If We Don’t Know What Life Looks Like?

The exciting possibility of extraterrestrial life and alien contact has been a topic of keen human interest for several years. This is exemplified by the countless science-fiction literature, movies, shows, and conversations that expound upon the fantasy of discovering that humans are not alone in this universe. In fact, the first organized, modern scientific project to detect, and possibly make contact with extraterrestrial beings dates back to 1960 (“Project Ozma,” n.d.). This project, named Project Ozma, attempted to detect interstellar radio transmissions around the stars Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridani. From these two-thousand dollar experiments, humanity has now progressed to multimillion dollar missions, in an effort to collect evidence for the possibility of other lifeforms in the universe. 

Generally, when searching for life, humans have sought out qualities seen on Earth and life that is bound to Earth. The criteria for life in space is ever-evolving, but often scientists search for a source of energy, carbon-based chemistry, nitrogen, oxygen, traces of DNA or RNA, and conditions for liquid water to exist, to name a few (McKay 2014). In addition, NASA supports the concept of the Habitable Zone, or the “Goldilocks zone,” which is characterized as a particular distance from a star at which an orbiting planet may contain liquid, surface-level water (NASA 2020). Since liquid water is a hallmark of life on Earth, it seems to be a logical step to look for the same in other planets in search for life. However,what if none of these characteristics are truly the universal requirement for life? The greatest obstacle in finding extraterrestrial life may be human bias and arbitrary assumptions about what life is.

For example, Mars’ geology poses an interesting case study, especially when challenging human notions of what extraterrestrial life may look like. Although Mars today doesn’t present the conditions to sustain liquid water, evidence suggests that Mars had substantial liquid water on its surface 3.7-4 billion years ago, during the Noachian Period (Mitra 2019). Many surfaces of Mars are covered with extensive valley networks and basins that are speculated to have been carved by flowing water in the past (Figure 1)  (McCollom 2006). Although surface water doesn’t exist on Mars (or at least not anymore), the planet’s geothermal activity leads to speculation about the potential for groundwater (Stamenkovic et al. 2021). Further analysis of Mars’ mid-crust (∼11.5 to 20 km deep) finds fractured igneous rocks that are saturated with water (Wright et al. 2024). 

Figure 1: Valley networks suggest that rivers may have once flowed on Mars. This photograph was taken by NASA’s Viking mission (NASA, 2003)

Although these developments about the condition of Mars are incredibly groundbreaking, and push forward the quest of finding life on other planets, they are not entirely indicative that there is life there. The presence of characteristic Earthly biomarkers on Mars does not guarantee that there is life on Mars. It may happen that scientists do not recognize life on mars entirely, because it does not fit the human definition of what “life” is. If the search for extraterrestrial life is shaped by assumptions derived from a single planet, then human bias will be the largest hindrance to astrobiological discovery. 

References

Mitra, Kaushik (The Planetary Society). 2019. “Mars Used to Have Water, But We Can’t Explain How.” May 7. https://www.planetary.org/articles/mars-water-stable-paradox. 

McCollom, Thomas M. 2006. “The Habitability of Mars: Past and Present.” In Solar System Update, edited by Philippe Blondel and John W. Mason. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37683-6_6. 

McKay, Christopher P. 2014. “Requirements and Limits for Life in the Context of Exoplanets.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (35): 12628–33. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304212111. 

NASA. 2020. The Habitable Zone – NASA Science. Exoplanets. October 26. 141. https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanets/habitable-zone/. 

NASA. 2003. “Deep Space 2 Mission: Mission Objectives.” https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/nmp/ds2/mission/objective.html.

“Project Ozma.” n.d. Accessed November 9, 2026. https://www.seti.org/research/seti-101/project-ozma/. 

Stamenkovic, Vlada et al. 2021. “Deep Trek: Science of Subsurface Habitability & Life on Mars.” https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/entities/publication/fe4f9f81-8ee7-4232-92ee-c3a8f2950c66. 

Wright, Vashan, Matthias Morzfeld, and Michael Manga. 2024. “Liquid Water in the Martian Mid-Crust.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (35): e2409983121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2409983121. 

Comments

5 Responses to “What If We Don’t Know What Life Looks Like?”

  1. Gurleen Hunjan Avatar
    Gurleen Hunjan

    Hi iSci!

    I wrote this post after taking inspiration from RP1! I was interested in how our biases on what life is influence our pursuit for extraterrestrial lifeforms. I decided to use Mars as a case study for this, thus connecting lifesci, earthsci, and a little bit of psych!

  2. Eshal Hadibhai Avatar
    Eshal Hadibhai

    Hi Gurleen!

    I love your connection to RP1 and expanding the search for life. Here’s a few minor suggestions for improvement.

    – In P2S1, the phrase “life that is bound to Earth” is a little confusing, I think the sentence works fine without it.
    – In the third sentence of the last paragraph Mars is missing a capitalization.
    – Lastly, your in text citation links lead to a Zotero error and take the viewer off of synopsis so I would remove the hyperlink from them.

    That’s all! Really minor things, your blog post is great!
    Eshal

  3. Veer Jain Avatar
    Veer Jain

    Hi Gurleen,

    I thought your post was really interesting, especially the idea that our own understanding of life might limit our ability to discover it elsewhere! I have a few suggestions:

    – P1: The phrase “for several years” seems to underestimate how long humans have been interested in extraterrestrial life. Maybe change this to “for centuries” or something similar.
    – P2: I think you could expand a little on what alternative forms of life might look like. For example, are there any proposed alternatives to carbon-based life? Including an example could help readers understand how our current assumptions might limit us.

    Overall great work, and good luck on your final draft!
    Veer

  4. Edgar Lee Avatar
    Edgar Lee

    Hi Gurleen

    This is an interesting topic and I enjoyed reading your blog. I do have some suggestions.

    The first sentence in the fourth paragraph is wordy. It feels like you smashed three sentences together. I don’t think the middle portion “and push forward the quest of finding life on other planets” is necessary. I do recommend cutting it to reduce redundancy.

    I like your writing style. They flow smoothly, although I believe you can dive deeper into the life science and psychology component, rather than merely listing facts. For instance, the argument regarding human bias can evolve to discuss the inconsistency of the definition of life. A follow up premise can be easily made as biases are inevitable, therefore, “xyz” are strategies to compensate for bias.

    Best,
    Edgar

  5. Sara Osman Avatar
    Sara Osman

    Hi Gurleen,

    This was a very interesting blog post to read with a clear connection to RP1. Here are a few suggestions:
    – Your conclusion could be strengthened by suggesting how scientists might overcome human bias and broaden the criteria used when searching for extraterrestrial life. You provide a (very real) problem but your blog could use just a brief mention of a particular solution.
    – The transition between your general discussion of extraterrestrial life and the Mars case study could be a little smoother. A sentence explaining why Mars is a useful example of the limitations of Earth-based assumptions would help connect these ideas.
    – You mention the possibility of groundwater deep beneath Mars’ surface, but could briefly explain why these environments might be capable of supporting microbial life. This would help readers better understand the significance of the research you discuss.

    Great job again. And happy editing!
    Sara

Leave a Reply