And For the Lady, Perhaps a Salad

Somewhere, a man is boasting about his 3000-calorie diet while presumably ordering a bowl of lettuce for the woman he’s on a date with. His assumption is that women require fewer calories than men, so a salad will do. However, the truth is more complicated than that.

On average, women do have lower daily energy requirements. This is demonstrated by the Mifflin-St Jeor equation, a standard for estimating adult basal metabolic rate (BMR). It uses the same terms for weight, height and age, but subtracts 161 kcal per day for women and adds 5 kcal per day for men (Mifflin et al. 1990).

Figure 1. The difference in caloric needs for a man and woman of the same height (173 cm) and weight (68 kg) as calculated by the Mifflin-St Jeor equation (Mifflin et al. 1990). The man has a basil metabolic rate of 166 kcal more than the woman.

It is important to note that the Mifflin-St Jeor equation is more like a line of best fit than an accurate measurement. This is because the caloric gap is attributed to body composition, not sex itself, since our tissues do not burn energy equally. Per kilogram, skeletal muscle tissue expends roughly 13 kcal/day and adipose (fat) tissue about 4.5 kcal/day (Wang et al. 2010). On average, men carry more muscle mass while woman carry proportionally more fat, hence why men tend to have higher BMRs (Wells 2007).

Figure 2. Male vs. female fat mass index as a function of time. This demonstrates how the average female has a higher fat mass index (after infancy) compared to the average male over the course of their life (Wells 2007).

With that said, this doesn’t mean that needing less fuel is the same as needing less nutrition. Salads are a good example of this, as they are not the ultimate diet food that people perceive it to be. Consider its chemistry: Iceberg lettuce is 95% water and contains under 1 gram of protein (FoodData Central 2022). Salad greens are often more than 90% water, and much of their carbohydrate is cellulose, which humans can’t digest. That leaves little protein, which maintains and repairs tissue; little fat, which supplies essential fatty acids, supports hormone production and aids vitamins A, D, E, and K absorption; and little digestible carbohydrates, which are the brain’s main fuel (Institute of Medicine 2005).

Low energy density can help people feel full on fewer calories, but only if the meal also contains enough protein and fat to keep you fed until the next one (Rolls et al. 2004). The irony is that salads often fail in both categories. A plain bowl of lettuce and other greens leaves you hungry within hours; add dressing, chicken, cheese and croutons to fix that, and a “light” salad can easily exceed 600 kcal (FoodData Central 2022).

This isn’t all to say that salad is “unhealthy”, it is simply not a main dish. Add beans, fish or eggs, along with some whole grains or potatoes, and the bowl becomes a meal (Canada’s Food Guide 2019).

Figure 3. Government of Canada (2019) recommended food guide that depicts a plate of 50% vegetables and fruits, 25% whole grains (e.g., whole grain bread, brown rice, oatmeal, whole grain pasta), and 25% protein foods (e.g., beans, lentils, nuts, seeds, tofu).

Thus, women may need less fuel on average, but they still need quality nutrition. A smaller calorie budget is no excuse for a restrictive plate, nor is a mathematical equation that treats sex as a stand-in for body composition.

References

“Canada’s Food Guide.” Government of Canada , June 29, 2026. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-guide/explore/snapshot.html.

“FoodData Central.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, October 28, 2022. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/.

Institute of Medicine. 2005. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10490.

Mifflin, MD, ST St Jeor, LA Hill, BJ Scott, SA Daugherty, and YO Koh. “A New Predictive Equation for Resting Energy Expenditure in Healthy Individuals.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 51, no. 2 (1990): 241–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/51.2.241.

Rolls, Barbara J., Julia A. Ello‐Martin, and Beth Carlton Tohill. “What Can Intervention Studies Tell Us about the Relationship between Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Weight Management?” Nutrition Reviews (Oxford, UK) 62, no. 1 (2004): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00001.x.

Wang, ZiMian, Zhiliang Ying, Anja Bosy‐Westphal, et al. “Evaluation of Specific Metabolic Rates of Major Organs and Tissues: Comparison Between Men and Women.” American Journal of Human Biology 23, no. 3 (2010): 333–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.21137.

Wells, Jonathan C.K. “Sexual Dimorphism of Body Composition.” Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 21, no. 3 (2007): 415–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2007.04.007.

Comments

9 Responses to “And For the Lady, Perhaps a Salad”

  1. Zara Sarfraz Avatar
    Zara Sarfraz

    Hi iSci!

    RP1 has got me thinking a lot about the applications of math in scientific fields as , so I decided to look into its application in one of my favourite fields: health and nutrition!

    Having an older brother who can eat everything in the fridge before gaining a pound has always had me thinking about how unfair it can be sometimes that men have so much more flexibility in their caloric intake. Thus, I decided to discuss why that is, and why that may not always be the case! When it is the case, however, the traditional “healthy girl” diet always steers towards a salad. I wanted to research the truth behind whether or not salads really are the healthy gold standard we treat it as. I found some results that I’m excited to share.

    Any and all constructive comments are welcome.

    Happy reading!

    Zara

  2. Ava Sproule Avatar
    Ava Sproule

    Hi Zara,

    Really interesting blog post! I think this is a great way to address a concept that is often misunderstood. I have a few suggestions:

    – Consider explaining what the purpose of subtracting 161 kcal for women and adding 5 kcal for men. These feel like very standardized values and would be interesting to know exactly where they came from.

    – I am a little unsure of how the difference in muscle mass vs fat equates to having a higher BMR. Consider explaining that a little more.

    – Make sure to reference your figures in the text before it so it can be better integrated with your writing.

    Overall, I thought this was very well written and informative. Good luck with editing, and I look forward to read the final draft!

    – Ava

  3. Tsippora Brown Avatar
    Tsippora Brown

    Hi Zara,

    Super interesting blog post! I liked your writing style, and thought that your post was really engaging! I also really liked the variety of figures that you included in this post!

    Here are some things I noticed while reading:
    – In P4S3, you mention that iceberg lettuce has 1g of protein, however I don’t think you mentioned how much this is for (ex. iceberg lettuce has 1g of protein per 100g)
    – Consider discussing how these standardized numbers relate to actual BMRs
    – Also consider discussing alternatives to these standardized calculations
    – In P2, you discussed the Mifflin-St Jeor equation, and I think it could be interesting to discuss why that equation is used (and its relevance)

    Overall, great blog post. I look forward to reading the final version!

    Best,
    Tsippora

  4. Abbie Johnston Avatar
    Abbie Johnston

    Hi Zara

    I loved the title of your blog post! It is a great hook.

    I just have a few suggestions for you.

    1. This sentence, “On average, women do have lower daily energy requirements. “ needs to be cited
    2. The sentence after that one needs to be cited too.
    3. Make sure you cite your figure before it is seen in the text

    Overall great job
    -Abbie

  5. Kristen Taylor Avatar
    Kristen Taylor

    Hi Zara,

    This is such an interesting topic for a blog post and I feel like so much more could be said! (But I know you have a word limit and think you did a great job with what you wrote!) I also love the figures you chose and think they contribute a lot to the post. Here are a few suggestions I had for your edits:

    – In the figure 1 caption, make sure to clarify where the figure is from or whether you made it yourself by adding a citation at the end (either cite the source or yourself).

    – I recommend adding at least a sentence to acknowledge that:
    1) salad DOES have health benefits due to the nutrients it contains, such as vitamins and minerals (but you are right in everything you said about low energy density, macronutrient content, and ability to satiate)
    2) caloric needs CAN be higher for women than men, depending on activity levels and maybe certain genetic factors (but all your logic for the generalization of men needing more is well-substantiated)
    This doesn’t have to take many words, just a short sentence (or part of a sentence) for each would do and would help clarify your argument.

    – In sentences 2-3 of paragraph 4, I suggest sticking to either singular or plural when talking about salad (ex. “Salads are … they are not … perceive them … their chemistry …” vs “A salad is … it is not … perceive it … its chemistry”)

    Overall, great work and good luck with your edits!

    Kristen

  6. Lily McCormick Avatar
    Lily McCormick

    Hi Zara,

    I love this post and the meaning behind it (and especially the White Chicks reference). One important thing to note is to add page numbers to your in-text citations for your journal articles. For instance, in P4, you could add the page number to (Institute of Medicine 2005).

    Happy editing!
    Lily

  7. Farwa Rehan Avatar
    Farwa Rehan

    Hi Farwa,

    Amazing blog post! I especially loved your title, it was so engaging and really caught my attention! A couple of suggestions to make your post even better are:

    (1) P5S3: Change “light” to ‘light’
    (2) If you have the word count, maybe try to include the macronutrient needs of men and women and/or the average person. It would make your break down of iceberg lettuce per se, all the more impactful.

    Once again, great job!

    Happy Editing,
    Farwa 🙂

  8. Emily Martin Avatar
    Emily Martin

    Hi Zara,

    I thought this topic was very cool! The title immediately drew me in, and I especially like how you included math in the discussion about nutrition!

    I think the writing is very engaging, but I would love more information about BMR and metabolic differences. It’s a large part of the draw of your piece, so I think it would help to pad that section with more information about the differences between sexes and body composition. I would also mention hormones’ role in the metabolic differences, since testosterone tends to increase lean muscle mass, which is part of why men have a higher caloric need.

    Awesome post, and I can’t wait to see the final draft!
    Emily Martin

  9. Sara Osman Avatar
    Sara Osman

    Hi Zara,

    This was a very engaging blog post. I enjoyed your humorous approach to challenging everyday misogynistic assumptions. Here are a few suggestions:
    – Your explanation of the Mifflin-St Jeor equation is helpful, but it might be worth briefly clarifying that BMR represents energy used at rest, rather than a person’s total daily caloric requirements. This would help avoid potential confusion for readers.
    – You mention that differences in BMR are largely attributed to body composition rather than sex itself. It could be helpful to briefly acknowledge that individual factors such as activity level and muscle mass can also influence overall energy requirements.
    – The discussion about salads exceeding 600 kcal is interesting, but could use a little clarification that this depends heavily on portion sizes and ingredients. This would help avoid making it seem like adding nutritious toppings automatically makes a salad unhealthy.
    – Your conclusion is strong, particularly the line about mathematical equations treating sex as a stand-in for body composition. I would keep this phrasing because it brings your scientific discussion back to the broader social assumptions introduced at the beginning. Great job again!

    Happy editing!
    Sara

Leave a Reply