Too Hot to Handle? Not For the Pompeii Worm

Deep beneath the vast ocean, there lies an extremophile along hydrothermal vents on the East Pacific Rise: Alvinella pompejana (or the Pompeii worm). This small polychaete makes its home on the walls of active “black smoker” chimneys, where hot fluid, which is rich in minerals, pours into the sea (Desbruyères et al. 1998). Its environment is not suitable for the average organism, the temperatures can fluctuate, the water is acidic, and chemicals like hydrogen sulfide and heavy metals are present at levels that would kill most animals (Grzymski et al. 2008).

A conspicuous feature of the Pompeii worm is the thick layer of bacteria living on its back. These episymbionts form thin strands of projections from mucous glands along the worm’s dorsal surface. This consortium is composed primarily of Epsilonproteobacteria and displays strain-level diversity(Grzymski et al. 2008). Metagenomic analysis indicate that the symbiotic relationship between the Pompeii worm and its bacteria provide a stable source of nutrients and vitamins, and can even help detoxify harmful chemicals like reactive heavy metals and free hydrogen sulfide in the worm’s immediate environment (Grzymski et al. 2008; Tasiemski et al. 2014). The Pompeii worm’s success is greatly attributed to these microorganisms.

Figure 1. Temperature effects on Pompeii worm survival and stress response. Worms exposed to 55°C for two hours showed near-total mortality, strong stress response to heat, and tissue damage. Pompeii worms kept at 42°C survived well (Ravaux et al. 2013).

For years, the thermal biology of the Pompeii worm has been of considerable debate since temperature probes near the worms sometimes recorded readings above 60°C (Ravaux et al. 2013). Using isobaric sampling and a pressurized aquarium system, researchers exposed live specimen to controlled thermal areas while maintaining pressure similar to its environment. A two hour exposure to 55°C resulted in great mortality, damaged tissue, and a marked induction of the heat-stress gene hsp70 (figure 1). Exposure to 42°C produced higher survival rates and lower stress-response to heat (Ravaux et al. 2013). These findings indicate that the Pompeii worm’s optimal temperature would therefore be in between 40°C to 50°C, even though it can tolerate temperature above it for at least an hour (Ravaux et al. 2013). Related alvinellid worms, like Paralvinella sulfincola, actually prefer temperatures of 40–50°C and can endure short exposures to 55°C, showing that this whole group is among the most heat tolerant marine animals known (Girguis and Lee 2006).

Figure 2. Alvinellacin’s effect on epibiotic bacteria. Exposure to the worm’s natural antimicrobial peptide killed 100% of the two most abundant filamentous epibiont types, while leaving other types unaffected (Tasiemski et al. 2014).

The Pompeii worm is consistently regulating its epibiotic community through the production of alvinellacin, an antimicrobial peptide isolated from its coelomocytes. This peptide exhibits selective bactericidal activity, killing the most abundant filamentous epibiont morphotypes while leaving others unaffected (figure 2). This selectivity leads researchers to believe that the host mitigates the composition of its epibiotic community rather than random colonization occurring (Tasiemski et al. 2014). 

Both these studies show that Pompeii worms living in hydrothermal vent ecosystems is akin to their extremophile attributes, specifically within the very warm temperatures, and also how metabolically versatile they are. The Pompeii worm is exemplary for looking at the mechanisms by which multicellular life adapts to some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

References

Desbruyères, D., P. Chevaldonné, Alayse, A.-M, et al. 1998. “Biology and Ecology of the ‘Pompeii Worm’ (Alvinella Pompejana Desbruyères and Laubier), a Normal Dweller of an Extreme Deep-Sea Environment: A Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Recent Developments.” Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 45 (1): 383–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(97)00083-0.

Girguis, Peter R., and Raymond W. Lee. 2006. “Thermal Preference and Tolerance of Alvinellids.” Science 312 (5771): 231–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125286.

Grzymski, Joseph J., Alison E. Murray, Barbara J. Campbell, et al. 2008. “Metagenome Analysis of an Extreme Microbial Symbiosis Reveals Eurythermal Adaptation and Metabolic Flexibility.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (45): 17516–21. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802782105.

Ravaux, Juliette, Gérard Hamel, Magali Zbinden, et al. 2013. “Thermal Limit for Metazoan Life in Question: In Vivo Heat Tolerance of the Pompeii Worm.” PLoS ONE 8 (5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064074.

Tasiemski, Aurélie, Sascha Jung, Céline Boidin-Wichlacz, et al. 2014. “Characterization and Function of the First Antibiotic Isolated From a Vent Organism: The Extremophile Metazoan Alvinella Pompejana.” PLoS ONE 9 (4): e95737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095737.

Comments

4 Responses to “Too Hot to Handle? Not For the Pompeii Worm”

  1. Albesa Fazliu Avatar
    Albesa Fazliu

    Hi iSci!

    Thanks for reading my blog.

    I was inspired to write about the topic of extremophiles as prompted by Chad’s recent Life Science lecture where we learned about them in greater detail! After looking at an overview of a few extremophiles, I decided to look at the Pomepii worm as I found the symbiotic relationship between itself and its bacteria quite interesting. This topic connects to the biology aspect of Life Science, as well as a little bit of chemistry in the processes related to this cool extremophile.

    I’m looking forward to receiving feedback!

    Best,
    Albesa

  2. Aanya Patel Avatar
    Aanya Patel

    Hey Albesa!

    Very interesting topic, I had never heard of this specific species of worm before and it’s really cool how you were able to relate back to our extremophile lecture! I have some suggestions if you would like to add them.

    Really small recommendation, but I would like to know why it is called the Pompeii worm out of curiosity, and if it is possibly related to the Pompeii volcanic eruption? I would have just liked the backstory to its interesting name!

    Adding onto that, I think it would be helpful if you introduced in the first paragraph exactly what you will be talking about in the blog. I really like how you discussed the extreme environment the worms live in, but I think stating your central argument can clear up what the blog is talking about overall.

    In P2 you talk about how the Pompeii worm is able to “detoxify harmful chemicals like reactive heavy metals and free hydrogen sulfide” I think this is really interesting and if you could it would be nice to see how these worms can be used in or have been used in studying methods of bioremediation on polluted toxic environments!

    Throughout the article you use scientific terms like; episymbionts, isobaric sampling, and coelomocytes. By providing just a short explanation on what these terms are would make the blog more accessible to readers who may not have a strong background in microbiology or have seen these words before.

    Overall, great research and a really interesting topic. Happy editing!

    -Aanya

  3. Euna Kim Avatar
    Euna Kim

    Hi Albesa!

    Your blog post was a great read. As someone who enjoys learning about the history and natural phenomena associated with Pompeii, reading about the Pompeii worm was fascinating to me. In terms of feedback, I would suggest clarifying specific terminology that is relevant to your text. For example, there are terms such as “isobaric sampling” that may be difficult for the reader to understand. By providing a short explanation (if word count permits) on the mechanisms or the significance, readers can better comprehend important concepts in the text.

    Furthermore, it would be helpful to briefly elaborate on why the selective bactericidal activity of alvinellacin is significant. This could help readers understand host-microbe interactions that are relevant to your topic.

    Overall, I enjoyed reading your blog and found the topic interesting- I hope these suggestions help!

    – Euna

  4. Ava Elcsics Avatar
    Ava Elcsics

    Hey Albesa,

    I enjoyed reading you blog post and I found it interesting how you connected extremophiles to the chemistry of cool extremophiles.

    Some suggestions include:
    – One grammatical suggestion for the caption of figure one, is to change ” near-total mortality, strong stress response to..” to “near-total mortality, a strong stress response to…”
    – In P3S4,the word “therefore” is unnecessary in this particular sentence
    – In terms of formatting, ensure that both the genus and species are italicized in the writing.
    – I think it would also be helpful to expand on how exactly the Pompeii worms regulate their epibiotic community.

    This was a great read and happy editing,
    Ava

Leave a Reply