Got a Hair Tie? Asking for My Sanity

Quick! You have an assignment due in 1 hour. What’s the first thing you’re doing? Well, for those of us with long hair, we’re probably tying it up into a ponytail. Now, with your hair out of the way, suddenly you’re ready to take on the challenge. Have you ever wondered why that is? I propose that the answer may be a little more scientific than you think.

Let’s consider Pavlov’s findings with classical conditioning. Although his experiment with his dog established the attachment between neutral stimuli and reflexes, another separate experiment proved the attachment between neutral stimuli and emotional states (Watson & Rayner 2000). When an infant was repeatedly shown a white animal, such as a rabbit or a rat, followed by a loud banging of a metal bar being struck with a hammer, he gradually began to fear white animals, and would begin crying at the mere sight of one (Watson & Rayner 2000). Now take away all the ethical and moral violations within this experiment, and swap the animal for a hair tie. If you tie up your hair before every lab, exam, or deadline, the act becomes a neutral stimulus that triggers now conditioned responses, such as focus and/or stress arousal. As a result, repeatedly tying your hair in preparation to deeply concentrate on an objective gives the ponytail the ability to put your mind into “work-mode”.

Figure 1: The top left bubble shows the final result of Pavlov’s experiment, and the remaining bubbles, from left to right, illustrate the results of Watson and Rayner’s experiment, “Little Albert” (Olah 2026)

Now here’s a surprise: your hair is an organ—well, at least the follicle is. Each one is wrapped in low-threshold mechanoreceptors that can be activated by simple mechanical stimuli, such as deflecting the hair follicles (Li et al. 2011). Loose hair that brushes your face and neck fires these receptors constantly. Though most of that signal is filtered out through sensory adaptation, each deflection is an interruption that competes for your attention (Wark et al. 2007). It is this kind of noise that makes us say we’re “overstimulated”. That’s the other great thing about ponytails; they remove that noise.

Figure 2: Diagram of the different mechanoreceptors located underneath the skin, wrapped around the hair follicle. Root hair plexus responds to hair deflection (“Skin Sensory Receptors” 2020)

Therefore, I believe that classical conditioning and our sensory receptors work together to make ponytails equal productivity. A quieter somatosensory environment makes work feel easier, which in turn strengthens the conditioned response of feeling more focused, and maybe a little stressed too.

So next time you reach for the hair tie on your wrist, remember it is a neuroscience and psychological theory in disguise.

References

Li, Lishi, Michael Rutlin, Victoria E. Abraira, et al. “The Functional Organization of Cutaneous Low-Threshold Mechanosensory Neurons.” Cell (United States) 147, no. 7 (2011): 1615–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.027.

Olah, Jessica. “What Was The Little Albert Experiment?” Verywell Mind, June 20, 2026. https://www.verywellmind.com/the-little-albert-experiment-2794994.

“Skin Sensory Receptors.” Alamy, June 15, 2020. https://www.alamy.com/skin-sensory-receptors-concept-with-nerve-and-hair-flat-vector-illustration-image470828422.html?imageid=AFCB11B5-F7AC-4B1A-9C82-AB26E96993F2&pn=1&searchId=0c45826b8e5d32d45fd900171fbbd910&searchtype=0.

Wark, Barry, Brian Nils Lundstrom, and Adrienne Fairhall. “Sensory Adaptation.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology (England) 17, no. 4 (2007): 423–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.001.

Watson, John B., and Rosalie Rayner. “Conditioned Emotional Reactions.” The American Psychologist (Washington) 55, no. 3 (2000): 313–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.3.313.

Comments

6 Responses to “Got a Hair Tie? Asking for My Sanity”

  1. Zara Sarfraz Avatar
    Zara Sarfraz

    Hi iSci!

    As someone with long hair, a find that it gets a bit annoying to deal with. The struggle that comes with it inspired me to research more about why I feel not just more comfortable, but productive with my hair tied up. Using the topic of classical conditioning we learned about in our psychology class, and the functions of neurons we’ve began discussing, I learned some pretty interesting things that I’m excited to share with you through this post!

    Any and all constructive comments are welcome!

    Thank you,

    Zara

  2. Clara Schimpky Avatar
    Clara Schimpky

    Hi Zara!

    Congrats on your first blog post. I love the way you connected an everyday experience to something scientific, and I think your realisation about why we tie our hair up was spot on. I have some suggestions:

    P1: I’m not sure how Rapunzel’s dance abilities connect to the rest of your post. Consider removing this reference, instead creating a hook about putting your hair up before a lab or exam, and renaming your post accordingly.

    P2S2: Remove the ‘as well’ at the end of this sentence, as it isn’t necessary. Also, add a citation at the end of this sentence, even if it’s the same one as you use later on (eg: Watson & Rayner 2000).

    P2S4: While this sentence is funny and true, it is a little too personal and doesn’t align with the scientific writing style expected in blog posts. Consider removing it, and starting your next paragraph with “A more relatable example of this phenomena is the act of tying hair up. If you…”.

    Figure 1: This figure is not scientific and doesn’t add to the content of the post; consider removing it.

    P3S1: Take out ‘here’s a surprise’, and begin with ‘Hair follicles are organs…”

    General comment: Blog posts usually take on a more professional tone. While the first paragraph, or ‘hook’ can be more fun and casual, the rest of the post should be scientifically written. This generally includes not using personal pronouns, and removing sentences that do not hold information, making writing more concise.

    Great job overall. You clearly communicated the science behind overstimulation as well as Pavlov’s experiments. I look forward to reading the final draft! Happy editing 🙂

    – Clara

  3. Veer Jain Avatar
    Veer Jain

    Hi Zara, I enjoyed how you used neuroscience and psychology into delve deeper into a seemingly regular habit. I have a few suggestions for edits.

    – P2: The transition between Pavolv and Watson and Rayner’s experiment is a little abrupt. Consider “Watson and Rayner proved the attachment between neutral stimuli and emotional states.”

    – P3: (Wark et al, 2007) should be (Wark et al. 2007)

    – Figure 2: Consider making the caption more descriptive by identifying which receptors respond to hair movement.

    Overall, great work on your first post!

    Veer

  4. Tvara Parikh Avatar
    Tvara Parikh

    Hi Zara!

    I really enjoyed reading your blog post! I thought it was interesting how you connected an everyday habit, like tying up your hair, to concepts we have been learning about in psychology and neuroscience. Your explanation of classical conditioning was especially engaging, and I liked how you connected sensory adaptation to the idea of reducing distractions while studying. Here is just a few things to change:

    -Make the transition between the first paragraph and the scientific explanation smoother so the introduction connects more naturally to the main topic. You could also consider shortening a few sentences to make the writing more concise and easier to follow.
    -(Wark et al, 2007),” the citation should be written as “(Wark et al. 2007).” I would also recommend checking comma placement throughout the post and breaking up some longer sentences to improve readability.
    – Some phrases, such as “Now here’s a surprise” and “That’s the other great thing about ponytails,” are quite conversational, so you could replace them with more formal transitions to make the scientific writing flow better.

    Overall, I thought this was a creative and engaging way to explore the science behind an everyday experience. Great job!

  5. Ria Chhabra Avatar
    Ria Chhabra

    Hi Zara,

    The topic of your blog post was so interesting and I love how you blended psychology and biology in the context of Rapunzel! Here are a few suggestions:

    Figure 1: Consider using a diagram of classical conditioning or the white rabbit experiment.
    P3: How is each follicle wrapped in mechanoreceptors? Is there a more specific word you could use instead of “wrapped”?
    References: be sure to italicize the journal name such as The American Psychologist

    Happy editing,
    Ria

    1. Zara Sarfraz Avatar
      Zara Sarfraz

      Hi Ria,

      Thank you so much for your feedback! I’ve applied your tips regarding Figure 1 and the reference list.

      Though I agree that I could replace “wrapped” to make the placement of the mechanoreceptors more specific, the replacement would be more anatomical jargon, such as “arborized” or “plexus” that I don’t want to overwhelm the reader with! Keeping in mind that my audience included busy iSci students who may not be familiar with such terms (as I wasn’t prior to writing this blog), I believe Figure 2 should be effective in helping the reader visualize how the receptors are positioned in relation to the follicle.

      I could still use those terms and explain their meaning, but I’d like to stay on the topic of hair and how it relates to our productivity as much as I can.

      Again, thank you for your feedback!

      Zara

Leave a Reply